Legal Opinion
Golodner v. Berliner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 27, 2014No. 12-1173-cvPublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellees Daniel Golodner and Security Technology Systems (“STS”) brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the City of New London (“the City”) and two City officials, defendants-appellants Martin Berliner and Robert Myers (“Appellants”), retaliated against Golodner for exercising his rights under the First Amendment when he filed an earlier lawsuit against the City and several of its police officers (“Golodner I ”). Appellants sought summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Montero v. City of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- McKinney v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Dixon v. Von BlanckenseeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Francis v. FiaccoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Hurd v. FredenburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.