In Re Orzel
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM
J. PHILIP KLINGEBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.
On September 17, 2007, the debtors (“Orzel”), by counsel, filed an objection to Claim # 1 filed by creditor Urban & Burt (“Urban”). The objection asserts that the claim “is a divorce-related debt, but does not meet the criteria of support”, and thus that the claim does not meet the criteria for allowance as a priority claim and should be allowed as a general unsecured claim. Notice of the objection was properly provided to Urban by the debtors. On October 16, 2007, Urban filed a timely response to the objection.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Keith Alan Kline, Debtor. Ronald R. Holliday v. Keith Alan KlineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of Wade S. Seibert and Deanne M. Seibert, Debtors-Appellees, Appeal of Green County, State of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Cooper v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
- Hartley v. Townsend (In Re Townsend)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall v. Marshall (In re Marshall)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2013
- McNeil v. DrazinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Davis, Matthews & Quigley, P.C. v. ElhagUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019