Legal Opinion

Parrino v. Sebelius

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 17, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-38-TBRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge, United States District Court

At the request of the parties, the Court will determine whether or not Mr. Parrino has a Fifth Amendment Due Process claim as a matter of law. (Docket No. 38.) The Plaintiff, Leo Parrino, has submitted a brief on the matter. (Docket No. 24.) The Defendants, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and Daniel R. Levinson, Inspector General, have also filed a brief on the matter. (Docket No. 25.) As the Court has given the parties an opportunity to submit additional briefs…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parrino v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API