State, Ex Rel. Weber v. Eirick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LIEGHLEY, PJ.
At the hearing it was stated and admitted that the two cases are in principle identical in all respects with one exception. In the Barrett case the reason assigned -in the notice for the discharge was “Partisan Political Activity on or about October 3rd, 1933, or on or about November 7th, .1933.” The reason given in one case- is no more' specific than in the other, and the decisions of both must be- the same.
’ Th'e only question urged for decision was whether or not the reasons assigned in the notices for the discharge of the respective relators were- sufficient and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Desprez v. Hancock County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Patton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Trust of MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Owens v. AckermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1955