Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Desprez v. Hancock County Commissioners
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1933No. 330PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.
The decision on this demurrer involves the construction of §486-17A GC as amended, Ohio Laws, Volume 114, page 224, which reads as follows:
“The tenure of every officer, employe or subordinate in the classified service of the state, the counties, city and school districts thereof, holding a position under the provisions of this act, shall be during good behavior and efficient service; but any such officer, employe or subordinate may be removed for incompetency,. inefficiency, dishonesty, drunkenness, immoral conduct, insubordination, discourteous treatment of the public, neglect of duty,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Bay v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Essling v. St. Louis County Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State, Ex Rel. Ashbaugh v. BahrOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Proctor v. Board of Education of Alliance Public School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hardin v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Bechstein v. Board of Education of Bowling Green City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.