Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Desprez v. Hancock County Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1933No. 330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.

The decision on this demurrer involves the construction of §486-17A GC as amended, Ohio Laws, Volume 114, page 224, which reads as follows:

“The tenure of every officer, employe or subordinate in the classified service of the state, the counties, city and school districts thereof, holding a position under the provisions of this act, shall be during good behavior and efficient service; but any such officer, employe or subordinate may be removed for incompetency,. inefficiency, dishonesty, drunkenness, immoral conduct, insubordination, discourteous treatment of the public, neglect of duty,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Bay v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Essling v. St. Louis County Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. State, Ex Rel. Ashbaugh v. BahrOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Proctor v. Board of Education of Alliance Public School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hardin v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Bechstein v. Board of Education of Bowling Green City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API