American Photocopy Equipment Co. v. Fair (Inc.)
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
1) Motion of defendant, The Fair, to consolidate with lower numbered case, under Rule 42(a).
2) Motion of defendant, The Fair, to. amend its answer.
The cause in 62 C 2258 arises under the patent laws of the United States, with jurisdiction conferred by Sec. 1338(a), Title 28, U.S.C. Plaintiff alleges that defendant, The Fair, has infringed its patent rights under United States Letters Patent No. 2,657,618, a developing apparatus, by making, using, and selling products embodying inventions covered by said patent. In its answer, defendant denies infringement, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. KnauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- National Nut Co. of California v. Susu Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- New England Mut. Life Ins. v. BrandenburgDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Magnavox Co. v. APF Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Disher v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Magellan Navigation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- Madigan, Inc. v. GoodmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.