Legal Opinion

Blut v. Katz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 13, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

13 N.J. 374 (1953)

99 A.2d 785

GUSSIE BLUT, AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ISAAC BLUT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

BENJAMIN KATZ AND HERMAN MARKS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 14, 1953.

Decided October 13, 1953.

Mr. Hymen D. Goldberg argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Mr. Abram Waks, attorney).

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, on the brief; Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Midler v. HeinowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Nye v. . HoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Cahill v. HaffNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. M. & C. Creditors Corp. v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. M. C. Creditors Corporation v. PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API