Legal Opinion

Ansari v. Jimenez

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 23, 2022No. 2:20-cv-10719Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ALEXANDRE ANSARI, Case No. 2:20-cv-10719 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. MOISES JIMENEZ and CITY OF DETROIT, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION [59] Only malicious prosecution and Brady claims against Defendant Moises Jimenez remain in the case. ECF 1, PgID 10–14. Defendant asserted qualified immunity as a defense to the claims in a summary judgment motion. ECF 59. The parties briefed the motion, ECF 64; 65, and the Court ordered supplemental…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API