State of Arizona v. Oscar Castillo Mendoza
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 Following a jury trial, appellant Oscar Mendoza was convicted of child molestation and sentenced to a ten-year tern of imprisonment. On appeal, he argues the type of touching that was established at tidal does not meet the legal definition of the offense, rendering his conviction unsupported by sufficient evidence. He also contends the trial court erred in instructing the jury. We affirm for the reasons that follow.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to upholding the verdict, drawing all…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- Bieganski v. ShinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Duenas v. Oro Valley, Town ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.