Legal Opinion

Bright v. Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington Stock Exchange

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1971No. Civ. A. 71-433PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUYETT, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Stanley Bright, III, by complaint filed February 22, 1971, commenced this action against the Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington Stock Exchange (“PBW”), and the individual members of its Board of Governors (“Board”). Plaintiff claims that defendants violated a duty created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., by their failure to comply with the provisions of the PBW constitution.

Plaintiff averred that defendants violated the provisions of the PBW constitution by indicating on ballots prepared for the PBW…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Donald W. Buttrey, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Dobich Securities Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  3. First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. BergenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers BurginCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API