Legal Opinion

Pann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1930No. 6135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the government against William P. Pann, Jane Doe Pann, and Helen Donald to collect income tax and excess profit tax, based upon the returns of the Angeles Brokerage Company, a corporation, amounting to $1,435.03. It is alleged that the corporation had ceased doing business and dissolved subsequent to December 31, 1919, and that upon the dissolution its property was sold and distributed among the defendants, stockholders, leaving the corporation without assets. The defendants joined in an answer admitting the incorporation of the Angeles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Updike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Bronx Barge Corp. v. Connelly Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Hutton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Baumgartner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. Steinberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API