Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Marino

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1892No. 314PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

This was an action brought by respondents, as husband and wife, to recover damages for injuries inflicted upon the plaintiff Carrie Robinson by a dog owned and kept by appellant.

On the trial, one Dr. Hilton, a witness for plaintiff, having testified that he treated two wounds on plaintiff, which he described, was asked this question:

“ From your knowledge as a surgeon and general practitioner, can you tell what the probable cause of those wounds was ? ”

The question was objected to by defendant on the ground that the same was incompetent,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Curtis v. . Rochester and Syracuse Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Tyson v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Godeau v. BloodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  5. Wilkinson v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bell v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Williams v. JoinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API