Legal Opinion
Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1973No. Nos. 72-1628, 72-1629 and 72-1632PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners are public utility companies which operate power plants within the State of Ohio and the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857 to 1858 (1973 Supp.), Ohio and Kentucky submitted pollution-abatement plans to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The implementation plans, with minor exceptions not here relevant, were approved by the Administrator.
The public utility companies have petitioned this Court, under the provisions *165of 42 U.S.C. Section 1857h-5(b) (1), to review the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Asarco Inc. v. Air Quality CoalitionWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Commonwealth Edison Company v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Carl James Wedding v. John W. WingoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Mary Fletcher v. Housing Authority of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Duquesne Light Company v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.