Legal Opinion

Seavey v. Korte

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

By decision dated February 5, 1993 (156 Mise 2d 984) I ruled that a supplemental summons and amended complaint adding additional parties could be validly served upon the new parties without leave of court when all existing parties consented thereto. In so ruling I recognized that precedent in the Second Department called for a contrary result. However, I opined that the First Department, by reason of its decision in Snediker v Rockefeller Ctr. (182 AD2d 585 [1992]), would sustain the service.

However, as a consequence of the subsequent decision of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Snediker v. Rockefeller Center Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Maria v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Seavey v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Alvarez v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Westnine Associates v. West 109th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API