Seavey v. Korte
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
By decision dated February 5, 1993 (156 Mise 2d 984) I ruled that a supplemental summons and amended complaint adding additional parties could be validly served upon the new parties without leave of court when all existing parties consented thereto. In so ruling I recognized that precedent in the Second Department called for a contrary result. However, I opined that the First Department, by reason of its decision in Snediker v Rockefeller Ctr. (182 AD2d 585 [1992]), would sustain the service.
However, as a consequence of the subsequent decision of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Snediker v. Rockefeller Center Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- De Maria v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Andrew Greenberg, Inc. v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Seavey v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Alvarez v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995
- Westnine Associates v. West 109th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998