Chalupowski v. Berry
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). The district court dismissed the pro se appellants’ civil rights suit with prejudice on motion of the defendant. It then summarily denied the appellants’ Rule 60(b) motion, which asserted that they had not received notice that the court was considering dismissal of their suit. We affirm.
On this record, we conclude that the dismissal of the suit without notice did not affect the appellants’ substantial rights, and so the denial of Rule 60(b) relief was proper. See Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-AgostoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Kelley Bagby v. Steve BrondhaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, an Instrumentality of the Republic of Bolivia, a Foreign StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frieda Aaron v. Maureen O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Adrian Smith v. Massachusetts Probate & Family Court – Suffolk Division; Judge Abbe Ross, in her official capacity; and Commonwealth of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025