Legal Opinion

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClose, J.

In this action to settle the accounts of the respondents, as trustees, the adult defendants, who are children and grandchildren of Mary E. Cannon, the settlor of the trust, interposed no objections, while the guardian ad litem appointed to represent the infant defendants, who are the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the settlor, filed a report raising eighteen objections to the settlement of the account as requested by plaintiffs. The trial court disposed of all but two of the objections on the trial of the action in favor of the accounting trustees; and by its decision and judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. National City Bank v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. HowlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of Lawyers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. In re the Estate of RunalsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API