Legal Opinion

Morton v. Hart Bros.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlister, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Turney, C1t. J.

Plaintiff applied to defendants, insurance, agents, for a policy on Ms stock of goods. He directed them, if they could not give Mm a good company, to send Ms money back. Tkey sent Mm a policy in “Louisiana Insurance Company of New Orleans” for five hundred dol*428lars. That company had not complied with the law of the State making it unlawful “for any insurance company not organized under or incorporated by the laws of this State to transact any business of insurance in this State, through agents or otherwise, unless possessed of at least two hundred thousand dollars of paid-up,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrod v. Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Greenlee v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Cunnyngham v. ShelbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Crouch v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co. v. HarrodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API