Legal Opinion

In re De Vengoechea

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 15, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On application for writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

I do not find it necessary to consider the very interesting and important legal question that was argued as to the limitation of the common law right of a stockholder to examine the books of a corporation, by provisions inserted in the articles of association. I have reached the conclusion that the application is not made in good faith for the purpose of ascertaining the true status of the company or of taking measures to protect the interests of the applicant as’a stockholder, but rather for the purpose of annoying the company and perhaps…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud Milk Producers' Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. American Mortgage Co. v. RosenbaumOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Siena v. Grand Lodge, Etc., Order Sons of ItalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Feuer v. Merck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Vernam v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API