Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 2, 2006No. 06-376CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*327ORDER

HORN, Judge.

The pro se plaintiff in the above-captioned case, who appears to be a frequent litigant according to the allegations in and documents attached to the complaint, brings this action seeking $20,000,000.00 in damages against the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for alleged “violations of the Vth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (U.S. Const.) and violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1505....” The facts presented in the plaintiffs complaint also allege violations of due process by judges and employees of…

2Cases cited106 opinions

Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.