Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 14, 1938No. File #6026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

It should be noted that the purpose of these motions can not be to obtain information or evidence upon which to base an attack on the validity of any indictment which has been found on the strength of that evidence. This action was instituted, not on an indictment, but on an information, and, accordingly, theer is no indictment, for the accused to attack. The attack on the information based on claimed irregularities in the grand jury proceedings has already been made in the pleas in abatement (6 Conn. Sup. 215) and motions to quash (6 Conn. Sup. 227). On the pleas in-abatement, no evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. State v. FassetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  3. In re MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HayesConnecticut Superior Court · 1938
  2. Stratford Housing Authority v. Reese, No. Spbr-9411 28443 (Apr. 11, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API