Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 14, 1938No. File #6026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The question as to whether an accused should be .allowed to inspect documents which are in the custody of the state’s attorney (whether they have come there through grand jury proceedings or otherwise), although it may at first blush seem to be similar to the question as to his right to inspect grand jury minutes, is in reality fundamentally different. The record of the testimony before the grand jury is not evidence admissible on the trial of the accused to prove the truth of facts testified to. Documents and records in the possession of the state’s attorney are, or at least may be,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Daly v. DimockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. State v. Di NoiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  5. Massie v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Anonymous (1971-17)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API