Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Nordstrom

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1978No. NCM 77 1728PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNBAR, Senior Judge:

Appellant was charged with, and pled guilty to, Articles 80, 85, 92, 95 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 885, 892, 895, 934. A single specification was alleged under each Article. He was found guilty of the charges and specifications in accordance with his pleas; however, after findings, the military judge dismissed the charges laid under Article 92, UCMJ. Appellant was sentenced to be discharged with a bad-conduct discharge, to be confined at hard labor for 100 days and to forfeit $248.00 pay per month for 3 months. Pursuant to a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. RiveraU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  2. Wales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. United States v. HeathU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. KellyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. KupchikU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API