Legal Opinion

Crabtree Vickers, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1977No. C.D. 4707; Court No. 75-1-00278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

This action is brought to contest the classification of merchandise imported from England consisting of aluminum plates coated with a photosensitive plastic. Customs officials classified the plates as parts of printing machinery dutiable at 6 per centum ad valorem under item 668.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS).1

Plaintiff claims that the plates are properly dutiable at only 5 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 668.38, which provides as follows:

668. 38 Steel plates, stereotype plates, electrotype plates," half-tone plates, photo-gravure plates,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Christo Poulos & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. United States v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crabtree Vickers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. Lee Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API