Legal Opinion
Kean v. National City Bank
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1923No. 3797PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.
The only question presented by the record is the alleged error of the court below in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. The plaintiffs in error were therefore plaintiffs below.
It appears from the evidence that in November, 1920, $466,000 par value of Uiberty Bonds, the property of the plaintiffs, were stolen from an employé of the plaintiffs in the city of New York. The bonds involved in this case were part of those so stolen. Thereafter, in January, 1921, one PI. Diggs Nolen, of the city of Memphis, Tenn., a depositor at…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Munroe v. HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Nelson & Witt v. Texas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Shipley v. Meadowbrook Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Anderson v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.