Legal Opinion

Bates v. Jones

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 23, 1997No. C 95-02638 CWPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

WILKEN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Do the lifetime legislative term limits provisions of the California Constitution, as enacted by Proposition 140 in 1990, violate the United States Constitution? This question implicates some of the core values of our American system of government: majority rule, minority protections, the right to vote, the autonomy of the States, and the role of the federal courts in upholding constitutional principles.

Majority rule is the basic assumption of American government. The legitimacy of the democratic process, however,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bates v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Jones v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Citizens for Legislative Choice v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Citizens for Legislative Choice v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API