Legal Opinion

People v. Ruiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered January 17, 1969 granting defendant’s motion, after hearing, to suppress certain statements, unanimously reversed on the facts, and law, and the motion denied. The court found the defendant’s statements, which were made to the officers on the street prior to their giving the defendant the Miranda warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436), were admissible because they were made voluntarily while he was not in custody. As to those statements, the motion to suppress was denied. The court suppressed all acts performed by the defendant after the Miranda warnings were given to him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Maynard Francis HayesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1984
  2. People v. CongilaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. People v. NorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People v. MercadoNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API