Legal Opinion

PUMA SE v. Brooks Sports Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 14, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00116Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 PUMA SE, et al., CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00116-LK 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 13 BROOKS SPORTS, INC., JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 14 Defendant. ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED 15 COMPLAINT 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Brooks Sports, Inc.’s motion for 17 judgment on the pleadings on counts 1 through 4 of Plaintiffs PUMA SE and PUMA North 18 America Inc.’s complaint. Dkt. No. 141. Brooks argues…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API