PUMA SE v. Brooks Sports Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 PUMA SE, et al., CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00116-LK 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 13 BROOKS SPORTS, INC., JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 14 Defendant. ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED 15 COMPLAINT 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Brooks Sports, Inc.’s motion for 17 judgment on the pleadings on counts 1 through 4 of Plaintiffs PUMA SE and PUMA North 18 America Inc.’s complaint. Dkt. No. 141. Brooks argues…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.