State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Sappington
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BROADDUS, Judge.
This is a proceeding in mandamus wherein relator, Cecil Barnett, seeks to obtain a peremptory writ against respondents commanding them to issue a permit for the sale of intoxicating liquor in the original package. After a hearing, the trial court quashed the alternative writ. Relator appealed to the Supreme Court. That court held that it was without jurisdiction because no constitutional question had been sufficiently raised or preserved, and transferred the case to this court. See State ex rel. Barnett v. Sappington, Mo.Sup., 260 S.W.2d 669.
Relator owns and operates a drug…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Veltri Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- State v. SappingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Keeven v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Coots v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- St. Charles County v. McPeakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- St. Louis County v. TaggertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wintercreek Apartments v. City of St. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.