Legal Opinion

State v. Sappington

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 14, 1953No. 43471PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 S.W.2d 669 (1953)

STATE ex rel. BARNETT

v.

SAPPINGTON et al.

No. 43471.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.

September 14, 1953.

Carl F. Sapp, Columbia, for appellant.

L. W. Byars, Columbia, for respondents.

COIL, Commissioner.

Plaintiff-appellant sought a writ of mandamus requiring defendants-respondents, as members of the city council of the City of Columbia, to issue to plaintiff a city permit for the sale at retail of intoxicating liquors in the original package. The alternative writ was issued and a return, a reply to the return, and an answer to the reply, were filed. After a hearing,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Ingle v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State v. LOUIS UNION TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. BrandstetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Cirese v. SpitcaufskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. State v. GarretteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Ragan v. RaganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State v. NorthupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API