Legal Opinion

Scarf v. Aldrich

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1893No. 19070PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This action is to quiet title, and involves the validity of a sale of the premises in question by the guardian of the plaintiff to the defendant.

The complaint is in the usual form, alleging ownership in fee, that plaintiff is entitled to the possession, that defendant claims an interest adversely to the plaintiff, and that such claim is without right.

Findings and judgment passed for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment upon the judgment roll, and a bill of-exceptions setting out the evidence.

Elizabeth Wagner, the guardian of the plaintiff, filed a petition in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. AddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Richardson v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Townsend v. TallantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Stilwell v. . SwarthoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Mohr v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hubachek v. Maxbass Security BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. In Re Guardianship of JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. BURNETT v. HatchOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Henderson v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API