Legal Opinion

Allied Personnel of Raleigh, Inc. v. Alford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7410DC923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Since in the present case plaintiff’s verified complaint and the written contract, standing alone, would have entitled plaintiff to summary judgment, it was encumbent upon defendant to come forward with materials showing a genuine issue for trial or to provide an excuse for not doing so. See Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970).

*30First, defendant argues that the paper-writing did not amount to a contract. We disagree. Defendant expressly authorized plaintiff to act as agent in seeking employment for him and promised to pay for such services as provided by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Eastern Steel Products Corporation v. ChestnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. PORT CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY v. Housing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abbington Spe, LLC v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Solum v. CertainTeed Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. Deans v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Jackson v. Minnesota Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
  5. Angel Medical Center, Inc. v. AbernathyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API