Legal Opinion
Paist v. Town & Country Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 21, 1990No. 90 C 1060PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendant Town & Country Corporation (“Town & Country”) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff, John Paist, an Illinois resident, executed an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) in Illinois with Feature Enterprises, Inc. (“Feature”). (The Agreement is attached to Plaintiff’s complaint as Exhibit A.) Feature, a New York corporation and subsidiary of Town & Country, a Massachusetts Corporation, manufactures and sells jewelry…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Carl Sandburg Village Condominium Association No. 1, Plaintiffs v. First Condominium Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Republic Steel Corporation v. Pennsylvania Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Joseph A. Mescall v. Clark BurrusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Theodore Papapetropoulous v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zehner v. TriggDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. C.J.H., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Paist v. Town & Country Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991