Legal Opinion
Paist v. Town & Country Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 13, 1991No. 90 C 1060PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are summary judgment motions of defendant Feature Enterprises, Inc. (“Feature”) and plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons, the court denies both motions.
FACTS
Plaintiff, John Paist, was employed as a sales agent for Feature from 1984 until February, 1990. He sold various types of jewelry in Texas and was paid a commission of 2.0% or 2.5% on all orders from commissioned accounts that Feature received from plaintiff’s territory.
In August 1988, plaintiff, Feature, and Town & Country Corporation (“Town &…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Roboserve, Inc. v. Kato Kagaku Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Mark Twain Bank v. Continental Bank, NADistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993