Legal Opinion

State v. Ortega

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1968No. 246PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

Defendant was charged and convicted of breaking and entering in violation of Sec. 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953, the material part of which reads: “Burglary consists of the unauthorized entry of any vehicle, watercraft, aircraft, dwelling or other structure, movable or immovable, with the intent to commit any felony or theft therein.”

The defendant has appealed from the sentence imposed and contends (1) that there is an absence of substantial evidence to support the verdict and (2) that submitting the case to the jury constituted fundamental error.

Specifically, defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. SealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. FrankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. Schwilke Ex Rel. SchwilkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API