Legal Opinion
Wilmer Marroquin-Retana v. Attorney General United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 13, 2017No. 16-2714UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Wilmer Gustavo Marroquin-Retana (“Marroquin”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision ordering his removal and denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.
In September 2013, Marroquin, a native and citizen of El Salvador, entered the United States through Texas without inspection, and was apprehended at the border. About a week later, he expressed a fear of returning…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Timson v. SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Willian Rubio Barahona v. Robert M. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- W-E-R-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
- Willian Rubio Barahona v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021