Legal Opinion

Jacqueline LeGrande v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 4, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02630Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jacqueline LeGrande, No. CV-26-02630-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Federal Express Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Jacqueline LeGrande alleges she was rear-ended by a FedEx vehicle driven 16 by FedEx employee Kary Turnbull. LeGrande wishes to amend her complaint, which 17 currently identifies Turnbull only as “Federal Express Driver,” to include Turnbull’s name. 18 FedEx opposes the amendment, arguing it will require the case be remanded to state court. 19 LeGrande consistently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Herbert A. Middendorf v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Holbrook v. TaitanoDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API