Legal Opinion

Yeager v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 28, 1998No. 1961483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff Richard Yeager appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants General Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC") and Solomon Chevrolet Motor Company, Inc. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. On or about May 24, 1995, Richard Yeager entered into a lease agreement with the Solomon Chevrolet dealership for the lease of an automobile. In accordance with the lease agreement, Yeager was required to pay a refundable security deposit of $350.00. The lease agreement was later assigned to GMAC. On June 27, 1996, Yeager sued, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, alleging…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steinmetz v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  2. Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Continental Can Co. v. Owensboro Canning Co. (In Re Owensboro Canning Co.)District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1988
  4. Demitropoulos v. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Alford & Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. Business Bank v. White (In Re Timothy Dean Restaurant & Bar)District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Folks v. Tuscaloosa County Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Gunn v. World Omni Financial Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  5. Personal Financial Services, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API