State v. Forbes
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The respondent was convicted of the crime of adultery, and presents here one ground of error, only. It appeared that the woman involved gave birth to a child, which, at the time of the trial below, was about six months old. The State offered the baby in evidence on the ground that it gave physical evidence of its paternity and warranted an inference that the respondent was its father. Subject to the respondent’s objection and exception, the offer was sustained and the baby was exhibited to the jury.
The propriety of exhibiting a baby about six months old was before us in the recent case of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaillancourt v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Lohsen v. LawsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Bristol Manufacturing Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glascock v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Glascock v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972