Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Salot

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1958No. Civ. 23129PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment declaring that any title which he holds to property known as 283 Colwood Avenue, in the city of Puente, is held in trust for plaintiff and directing that he deed same to plaintiff free of encumbrance upon payment to defendant of the sum of $2,126.66. The only contention made on behalf of appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings.

The reviewing court is governed by the following rules: “The appellate court must accept as established all facts and all inferences favorable to respondent which find substantial support in the evidence.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. BP America Production Co. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  4. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Kaylor v. Crown Zellerbach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API