Legal Opinion

Meehan v. Crowder

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 20, 1946PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

Prior to the 9th, 10th and 11th of August, 1943, J. I. Crowder was in good health. On those dates he was directed by his employer to wash the interior of a building with a solution of bichloride of mercury. Crowder had been a painter for many years but had no previous experience or knowledge of the dangerous nature of the mercury solution. The only warning given was not to get the solution in his mouth. The building was not ventilated. The weather was hot and mosquito bites were plentiful. All conditions were favorable for the poisonous fumes to penetrate the body and blood stream…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. H. Kress Company v. BurkesSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Anderson v. JarrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Rayonier, Inc. v. LangSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Festa v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Fuchs Baking Co. v. Estate of SzlosekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  5. Worden v. Pratt and Whitney AircraftSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API