Legal Opinion

Sigal v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1985No. Docket 72768PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from a circuit court order affirming the decision of a hearing officer of the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department that the city is not estopped from collecting a water bill by reason of the city’s failure to read the water meter when the property in question was owned by plaintiffs’ predecessor in title. We affirm.

Plaintiff Sigal purchased a one-half interest in the 677 Selden Corporation, the major asset of which was an apartment building located at 677 Selden Avenue in Detroit. Sigal claims that, before agreeing to a purchase price, he inspected the corporate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Alexander v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. West Penn Power Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Jet Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Housing Authority v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, a Division of the City of Memphis v. Auburndale School SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API