Legal Opinion

Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor & Supply, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 8, 2000No. Civ.A. S-98-2519Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEPCO”), sued the Defendants, Electric Motor & Supply, Inc. (“EMS”), Charles M. Rhodes (“Rhodes”), Ralph Force (“Force”), and Darryl Price (“Price”), alleging violations of the -Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Title 18, sections 1962(a) and 1962(d). PEPCO’s cause of action under § 1962(d) was subsequently dismissed by this Court. After extensive discovery on the remaining claim under § 1962(a), Defendants filed two separate motions for summary judgment, one for lack of proof of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API