Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor & Supply, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEPCO”), sued the Defendants, Electric Motor & Supply, Inc. (“EMS”), Charles M. Rhodes (“Rhodes”), Ralph Force (“Force”), and Darryl Price (“Price”), alleging violations of the -Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Title 18, sections 1962(a) and 1962(d). PEPCO’s cause of action under § 1962(d) was subsequently dismissed by this Court. After extensive discovery on the remaining claim under § 1962(a), Defendants filed two separate motions for summary judgment, one for lack of proof of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.