Legal Opinion

In re K.E.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1987No. S-1634PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal is from a final order of the superior court whereby jurisdiction of a termination of parental rights proceeding was ordered transferred to the Tanana Tribal Court under the authority of 25 U.S.C. § 1911(b). While this appeal was pending, we decided Native Village of Nenana v. State, 722 P.2d 219 (Alaska 1986) cert. denied, — U.S.—, 107 S.Ct. 649, 93 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986). That case, like the one now before us, involved an attempt by an Alaska native village to obtain jurisdiction over a child custody matter involving village members. Id. at 220. Nenana sought an order from the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Native Village of Nenana v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Native Village of TananaAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re F.P.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hernandez v. LambertAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re C.R.H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API