Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Murillo

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1975No. 50210PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is a post conviction habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

Murillo contends that he is illegally confined on a void sentence. On June 5, 1973, he was convicted for the offense of robbery by assault by the use of a firearm under Article 1408 of the former penal code, Vernon’s Ann., which provided, in part, the punishment “ . . . by confinement in the penitentiary for any term of years not less than five years.” A plea of guilty was entered and the court assessed the punishment at life which was not authorized under the statute. He has not…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Ex Parte ReedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ex Parte ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Ex Parte WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API