Legal Opinion

Chasanow v. Smouse

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 1935No. [No. 6, April Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The only question submitted on this appeal is the ruling of the trial court, adverse to the plaintiff, on her first prayer, which was:

“The Court instructs the jury that the plaintiff, being a pedestrian, had the right of way at the street crossing over which she was walking at the time she was struck by the automobile of the defendant, if the jury shall find that she was struck by the automobile of the defendant while she was walking over the intersection of the street, and the jury is further instructed that if they find she was struck by the automobile of the defendant while walking across…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  2. Merrifield v. C. Hoffberger Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Hopper, McGaw & Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  4. Legum v. State Ex Rel. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Chiswell v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Straughan v. TsouvalosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Thompson v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Vizzini v. DopkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. Pegelow v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Brown v. RogersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API