Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hoffman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1927No. 12,633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, C. J.

Complaint by appellee in two paragraphs. The first paragraph alleges that appellant owns and operates a double-track line of railroad through Gas City, where it crosses a public highway in said city, known as South H street; that, at the time in question, appellant maintained an electric gong or bell on the south side of the street and west of the west track at said crossing for the purpose of warning travelers on the street of the approach of trains; that on July 24, 1923, about. 8:20 p. m., appellee, while traveling on said street, approached the crossing from the west; that a west-bound…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TatmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BaughnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chesapeake & O. Ry. v. BostonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API