Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Tatman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Blackford Circuit Court; William E. Eichhorn, Judge. Action by George Tatman against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.
—This was an action to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been sustained when appellee’s horse became frightened at an approaching train of appellant, while crossing the tracks of appellant, in the city of Hartford City. The complaint was in two paragraphs, to each of which demurrers were filed and overruled, and appellant then answered in general denial.
The first and second assigned errors are that the *521court erred in overruling the demurrers to the separate paragraphs of the complaint.
In its brief filed, and also in the oral argument had in this court, appellant, with great…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Shaber v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Terre Haute v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Gregg v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. MelvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.