Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. L. Moody & Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 4, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-G-167PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NOEL, District Judge.
At a hearing on June 15, 1973, the Court granted Frank Pinedo, Esq. and Jerry G. Hill, Esq., doing business as Pinedo and Hill, leave to intervene. Fed.R.Civ.P. 24. Intervenors initially represented defendant Shearn Moody, Jr. (hereinafter Moody), individually and doing business as W. L. Moody & Co., Bankers (Unincorporated) (hereinafter the Bank) in this case. 1 Intervenors claim unpaid legal fees totaling $12,471.83 for services rendered. Intervenors claim and seek to enforce a possessory lien against the assets of Moody here in receivership.
At the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Braswell v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Vaughn v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- L. Waterbury & Co. v. City of LaredoTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Cooley v. BuieTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. L. Moody & Co., Bankers (Unincorporated)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974