Legal Opinion

Hamelers v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1979No. Appeal, No. 995 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Rena Hamelers has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that she was ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that she had voluntarily accepted a leave of absence and thus was not thereafter available for suitable work. Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801 (d) requires as a condition *123of eligibility that workers be “able to work and available for suitable work. ’ ’

Ms. Hamelers was employed for five years…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Molnar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Defeo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bogucki v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API