Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Nocera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*770Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 20, 2003, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she failed to comply with reporting requirements.

Although claimant’s employment ended on April 4, 2003, she did not file an original claim for unemployment insurance benefits until April 14, 2003. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits effective April 7, 2003 through April 13, 2003 because she failed to comply with reporting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PrietoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of FoertschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim of SalukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API